The fickleness of the mob is shown in a spirit of comedy; the antagonism of Marullus and Flavius strikes the note of tragedy. Act I, Scene ii,
Teachers of English should be on intimate terms with the masterpieces they are expected to teach. They ought to have a clear idea of the action of the play, and mental pictures of the various scenes and characters.
They should be familiar with the fine lines; should be able to quote what is worthwhile; and should appreciate the diction, the wealth of allusion, and the various other literary qualities that combine to produce style.
The play forms part of the repertoire of most Shakespearean stock companies. There have been several motion picture productions of Julius Caesar as well as a number of television presentations.
Introduction to the Drama: The piece is an extract from a simplified prose version of the play. The incident described in the extract took place in 42 B. Brutus was a trusted friend of Julius Caesar, but he came to share the fears of the other conspirators, Cassius and Casca, that after his victory in Spain, Caesar had ambitions of being crowned king of Rome.
Rome was a republic and Brutus was an ardent republican. He joined the conspirators only to save Rome from the tyrannical ambitions of Caesar. There the conspirators, including Brutus, gathered round him under the pretext of presenting petitions and then stabbed him to death.
Briefing the Shakespearean Storyline: Jealous of Caesar for personal reasons, Roman senator Cassius convinces another senator, Brutus, that Caesar must die. The lofty-minded, idealistic Brutus fears that Caesar will destroy the Roman republic by having himself crowned king.
At the forum the conspirators stab Caesar to death.
Brutus addresses the populace in a fine, reasoned tone, giving a sound but uninspired explanation of his reasons for killing Caesar. He sentimentalizes Caesar's blood-soaked cloak until he has the multitude weeping with sorrow.
With masterful ease and without offering a single rational argument against Brutus's calm statement, Mark Antony turns the populace into a raging mob, howling for revenge against the conspirators.
The remainder of the play traces the battles between the triumvirate and the former conspirators, especially Cassius and Brutus, who meet their enemies on the plains of Philippi.
There, when the battle turns against them, both Brutus and Cassius—the first with an expected nobility and the latter with a nobility that makes one forget his earlier opportunism—commit suicide.
This had been a revenge play; for it had been a tremendous struggle of forces. The class had discussed the events leading up to the first triumvirate of Caesar, Crassus, and Pompey; they had seen the three-man world crumble to a two-man world, and then to a world with Caesar supreme.
They had followed the plot against Caesar, had seen Brutus beguiled by Cassius, and had seen his struggle to be true to friend and country.
They had watched the finesse with which Antony, the "limb of Caesar," became his avenger, and with Octavius and Lepidus the former of another three-man world. They knew that an old law forbade crowning a king in Italy; they were familiar with the duties of tribune, consul, praetor, and other great officials.
They were ready to show how the Caesar and the Brutus of Shakespeare differed from the Caesar and the Brutus of history. They had read Plutarch. A study of Julius Caesar demands familiarity with the historical background.
This should be acquired before the play is read in class. The events of the play begin February, 44 B. The dramatist has taken certain liberties with history; but he is more concerned with the play as a tragedy than as a historical drama.
Then, there is Roman official life. By questions bring out the facts in these political details. What were Brutus's duties as praetor?
How was he under special obligation to Caesar?Summary: Examines the William Shakespeare play, Julius Caesar.
Debates if the fates of Caesar, Antony, Cassius and Brutus necessary to maintain the melodrama. In William Shakespeare wrote and performed Julius Caesar, a play about an arrogant, tyrant .
In William Shakespeare’s tragedy, Julius Caesar, this idea of falsifying information for one’s own gain is apparent. Characters such as Cassius, Antony, and Decius Brutus all demonstrate that manipulation is a requirement in order to achieve an overall goal.
Biography of Julius Caesar and brief historical overview. 5. Analysis of Acts Events of play 3 years; Shakespeare. Day 3: Act 2. sc.3 Mar, 44 B.C. Reduces time to 6 days!
There is flattery in friendship- William Shakespeare “Yond. C. assius has a lean and hungry look. He thinks too much. There is no possible doubt that in Julius Caesar Shakespeare derived the great body of his historical material from The Life of Julius Caesar, The Life of Marcus Brutus, and The Life of Marcus Antonius in Sir Thomas North's translation of Plutarch. This work was first printed in in a massive folio dedicated to Queen Elizabeth.
Marc Antony In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Marc Antony was the only true powerful man to survive.
Throughout the play many people gain power and lose power. Throughout the play many people gain power and lose power.
I meeting with analysis ambiguity major themes: an analysis of william shakespeare makes liberal use of the play, scene complete with information regarding the scene iii, faster about the play, scene, held yearly to understand the conspiracy against caesar that is a summary b.