Work not for a reward; but never cease to do thy work. The Bhagavad Gita2: We cannot be held responsible beyond our strength and means, since the resulting events are quite outside of our control and, in fact, we have power over nothing except our will; which is the basis upon which all rules concerning man's duty must of necessity be founded.
Capital punishment -- the death penalty Opposing views on the death penalty: Allegedly invalid techniques of biblical analysis. An article by a retired federal judge opposing the death penalty: InRetired Federal Judge H.
Lee Sarokin wrote an article in the Huffington Post 1,2 urging Pat Quinn, the governor of Illinois, to sign a bill passed by the legislature that would repeal the death penalty in that state.
In my view deterrence plays no part whatsoever. Persons contemplating murder do not sit around the kitchen table and say I won't commit this murder if I face the death penalty, but I will do it if the penalty is life without parole. I do not believe persons contemplating or committing murder plan to get caught or weigh the consequences.
Statistics demonstrate that states without the death penalty have consistently lower murder rates than states with it, but frankly I think those statistics are immaterial and coincidental.
Fear of the death penalty may cause a few to hesitate, but certainly not enough to keep it in force, and the truth is that there is no way of ever knowing whether or not the death penalty deters. Because of the growing number of reversals, new trials and exonerations, the appeal process has become slow, long and expensive.
The death penalty is final and irreversible, and as a result, counsel are aggressive and courts are thorough. I cannot say whether or not the costs associated with appeals exceed those of life-time incarceration, but cost should certainly not be a determining factor in whether or not a person lives or dies.
Race plays a role in who becomes eligible for the death penalty and against whom it is imposed. I would suppose that this is a factor that could be corrected prospectively, but it is a risk that we should not be willing to undertake based upon past history.
This issue likewise has been discussed for years. After a lifetime of watching the death penalty at work, I believe that despite our understandable desire for revenge, retribution and even death for the most horrendous of crimes, the state should not be the carrier and enforcer of those emotions.
I recognize and respect the opposite view, but I just cannot accept that the intentional killing by the state of an individual is moral. However, the most compelling argument for me is the fact that we have executed innocent persons and others are scheduled for execution and others undoubtedly will be in the future.
Thanks to the Medill Innocence Project and others like it, and persons like Barry Scheck and his work with DNA, innocent persons have been snatched from lethal injections or other forms of execution, sometimes just moments before they were to die.
If none of the forgoing arguments are persuasive, this should and must carry the day. If we permit innocent people to be executed are we any better than the man who took that little girl's life in Tucson.
I suppose one could argue that the comparison is not apt because he was acting knowingly and intentionally in killing an innocent person, and the state is not, but in both cases the victims would be innocent and that is something no civilized nation should allow or tolerate.
Later that year, the Illinois Legislature passed a bill abolishing the death penalty and the governor signed it into law.
A comment by a professor of political science in favor of the death penalty: John McAdams, professor of political science, at Marquette University, stated: If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims.
I would much rather risk the former.
This, to me, is not a tough call. Dudley Sharp, the Death Penalty Resources Director of Justice for all -- an advocacy group promoting the death penalty -- wrote a report in titled:How to Write a Persuasive Essay.
In this Article: Article Summary Writing Persuasively Laying the Groundwork Drafting Your Essay Polishing Your Essay Sample Persuasive Essays Community Q&A A persuasive essay is an essay used to convince a reader about a . This essay isn't written like a murder mystery, where you need to read the whole thing to find out who the killer was.
We'll tell you right now who the killer was. Printed from yunusemremert.com On the Trial of Jesus.
The purpose of this essay is to provide an overview of the many issues and questions. Olodumare or Olorun as the supreme, self-existing deity. According to author Bolasi E. Idowu: "He is supreme over all on earth and in heaven, acknowledged by all the divinities as the Head to whom all authority belongs and all allegiance is due.
I like the faith message that I get out of the "literary device" viewpoint. My only minor quibble is that the order of Genesis 1 is close enough to the natural scientific order.
Apr 12, · The reason for increase in shooting cases in many countries has been linked to the number of households owning a gun.
More and more people now own a gun and that has led to increase in number of cases reported for murders in some countires.